Skip to main content

The Elderly Dictator Olympics: When Boomers Go Full Fascist and Nobody Gives a Shit



Ever notice how the most insidious power grabs don't happen in presidential palaces or corporate boardrooms, but in the mind-numbing tedium of apartment building councils? The banal fucking evil of democracy's demise, playing out not on CNN but between units 3B and 4F. Two geriatric masterminds—we'll call them Darth Arthritis and Emperor Depends—have orchestrated a bloodless coup that would make Vladimir Putin reach for his notepad. And yet, here we are, questioning if fighting back makes YOU the villain. Because apparently, once you qualify for the senior discount at Denny's, you also earn immunity from consequences for your actions.


So, I (Male, 30s) live in a mid-sized apartment building with a pretty standard setup: there's a building council that oversees maintenance, budget, administrative stuff, etc. Everything went relatively smoothly until two elderly neighbors — let's call them C and M (both in their 60s-70s) — decided to make the building their personal chessboard.

Mike and Mod got themselves voted onto the council this year, but not exactly by the book. They took over the annual assembly as "president" and "secretary" of the session (despite not being neutral parties), changed the voting rules mid-meeting, and ignored every objection that didn't suit them. The official minutes that came out later? Full of omissions and lies — including a claim that the vote for the council (which they now sat on) was unanimous. Spoiler: it wasn't. I was the only one actually voted in through real consensus.

Since then, they've overstepped their role over and over — publishing official documents before they were even registered with local authorities, acting on behalf of the building without authorization, and most recently trying to get me to sign off on a contract "as a council" without even involving the building's administrator. That's illegal where we live.

Earlier this year, C also made a completely false claim that the community could be subject to asset seizures due to a pending labor lawsuit — again, not how the law works. I'm fairly certain that was meant to scare everyone into letting them settle things without review or transparency.

I tried to handle things quietly. I've been patient. I've offered peaceful ways out. But now? I've filed a lawsuit to challenge the legitimacy of the assembly minutes and their actions. I'm also preparing a full public report to the community, detailing everything — and yes, it names names.

I've been told I'm being petty, or cruel — that they're elderly and maybe they didn't mean harm. But at some point, "not meaning harm" still leads to serious consequences. They've lied, manipulated, and acted like they were above oversight. The community deserves the full truth.

Am I the asshole for going full transparency mode and dragging them publicly (and legally) after trying to keep things civil for months?

TL;DR: Two elderly neighbors hijacked the building council through sketchy means, lied in the official records, overstepped their legal authority multiple times, and spread misinformation. After months of trying to handle it quietly, I filed a lawsuit and went public with the receipts. Now some say I'm being mean to old folks. Am I the asshole?

Source


The Bureaucratic Shitshow Dissection

Let's peel back the layers of this festering onion of human absurdity. Two walking fossils—who probably complain about "participation trophies" while sharing Facebook minion memes—have essentially declared themselves the divine rulers of your mid-sized apartment building. They hijacked an annual meeting with all the subtlety of a rhinoceros in a china shop, installed themselves as judge, jury, and executioner, then rewrote history faster than Stalin's favorite photo editor.

The minutes claim "unanimous" support—a word that has lost all fucking meaning, much like "organic" or "I'll call you back." It's the bureaucratic equivalent of a child scribbling "EVERYONE LOVES ME" on the walls with crayon while the house burns down around them. The only unanimity here was the collective sigh of resignation from residents too beaten down by existence to protest.

These geriatric Machiavellis aren't just power-hungry—they're incompetent too, the most dangerous combination since tequila and text messaging. They're publishing documents before they're legally registered, like releasing a sex tape before signing the consent forms. They're trying to get contracts signed without the administrator, which isn't just illegal—it's stupid on a cosmic scale, like trying to perform brain surgery with salad tongs after watching a YouTube tutorial.

And let's not forget the fear-mongering. Nothing sends middle-class property owners into a panic spiral like threatening asset seizure. It's manipulation so transparent you could use it as a fucking window, yet it works because humans are essentially hairless apes with mortgage anxiety and Amazon Prime accounts.

The cosmic joke here is that you tried to be reasonable—the universe's cruelest prank on the self-aware. You offered "peaceful solutions" in a reality where peace is just the temporary absence of conflict, like the brief silence between a lightning flash and the thunderclap that follows. You treated cancer with a fucking Band-Aid and then wondered why it spread.

The Void Stares Back

So now you've gone nuclear—lawsuits, public shaming, the whole nine yards of human retribution theater. And suddenly YOU'RE the bad guy for not respecting your elders? Fuck that sideways with a rusty chainsaw. Age is just the slow accumulation of time's indifference to your existence, not a get-out-of-accountability-free card.

The truly hilarious part is how this microcosm of human governance perfectly reflects our larger societal delusions. We create these pitiful structures—councils, boards, governments—believing they'll somehow transcend the base nature of the creatures who run them. It's like expecting wolves to fairly distribute sheep among the flock.

Your neighbors now clutch their pearls at your "cruelty," as if exposing truth were more violent than perpetuating lies. They've fallen for the greatest con of human civilization: that social harmony matters more than justice. It's the moral equivalent of putting a smiley-face sticker over the check engine light and declaring the car fixed.

Summary for the Cognitively Fucked

Two ancient assholes 👴👵 stole control of your building council through lies and manipulation 🐍, ran around breaking rules like toddlers on meth 💊, and spread bullshit scarier than campfire stories 🔥. You tried being nice 🙂 but they kept being dicks 🍆, so you're suing them and exposing their crusty asses publicly 📱⚖️. Now people think YOU'RE mean for not letting elderly crooks get away with it 🤦‍♂️. Moral of the story: Age doesn't cure asshole, it just wrinkles it. 💯

Self-Deception Index (6/10) The poster constructs an elaborate David vs. Goliath narrative, framing themselves as the lone truth-seeker battling geriatric corruption. While factual evidence is presented, the insistence on being "the only one actually voted in through real consensus" reveals a martyr complex. Their "peaceful ways out" claims smell faintly of tactical virtue signaling rather than genuine diplomacy.
Cosmic Insignificance Recognition (7/10) The building council drama is treated with constitutional crisis gravity. No awareness that in 100 years, all involved will be decomposing while cockroaches inherit their poorly maintained HVAC system. The lawsuit is framed as epochal rather than another grain of sand in humanity's infinite hourglass of petty power struggles.
Validation-Seeking Transparency (8/10) Masterful deployment of "reluctant hero" tropes. The receipts-dropping and legal action are presented as painful necessities, but the phrasing ("full public report... names names") betrays gleeful anticipation of communal reckoning. A textbook case of vengeance disguised as civic duty.
Moral Theater Performance (5/5) Shakespearean-level posturing. The invocation of "the community deserves the full truth" could be ripped from Aaron Sorkin's reject pile. Calculated use of legal terminology creates faux-objectivity while subtly positioning opponents as cartoon villains. Bravo.
Arbitrary Moral Framework Reliance (5/5) Uncritical worship of "transparency" and "due process" as divine virtues. The poster treats building bylaws with Talmudic reverence, never questioning whether these rules are themselves arbitrary constructs designed to give illusion of order to the entropy of communal living.
Animal Nature Concealment (8/10) Primitive territorial instincts are expertly veiled as principled stand. The core conflict - alpha males fighting over dominance hierarchy in concrete monkey tree - is obscured by references to legal technicalities. Even the lawsuit is just ritualized combat using the tribe's preferred weapons.
Existential Despair Indicator (7/10) This power struggle serves as existential anchor - without it, the poster might have to confront the void where personal meaning should reside. The intense focus on council minutae is a life raft in the ocean of cosmic indifference, desperately paddled to avoid drowning in nihilism.
Monstrosity Recognition Quotient (5/5) Zero acknowledgment that publicly eviscerating elderly neighbors might satisfy deep-seated psychological needs. The poster clings to self-image as righteous crusader, ignoring how their legal crusade mirrors the opponents' power grabs - just with different weapons.
Triviality-to-Gravity Ratio (8/10) A condo board coup framed with Nuremberg Trial gravitas. The stakes inflation reaches stratospheric heights - we're meant to believe the fate of Western democracy hinges on exposing Mildred's shady meeting minutes. All missing is a John Williams score.
Social Validation Schema (5/5) Textbook moral superiority reinforcement. The post is engineered to make readers feel like co-conspirators in taking down the Silver Fox Mafia. Each factual detail serves as brick in the edifice of OP's sainthood, constructing an unassailable monument to their own virtue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Shocking Truths About Friendship That Will Make You Trust No One Ever Again

 Ever notice how people say friendship is a two-way street, but nobody mentions it's also a fucking highway to hell paved with the corpses of good intentions? That's because humans are fundamentally deranged creatures who construct elaborate façades of connection while plotting each other's emotional murders. Today's pitiful exhibit: two supposed "friends" of twenty years destroying their relationship faster than Netflix cancels a show with actual substance. Hi everyone. I (29F) recently went on a roadtrip with my friend (30F) of over 20 years. While only 2 days into a 10 day trip, we got into a fight. We spent the night apart but ended up making up the next day and decided together to continue and try to communicate better. Shortly after we made up though, I asked her if I could take a nap in the car while she did some driving toward our next destination. She said no problem. When I woke up, I noticed we were not going in the right direction. We were ...

Helicopter Parents Seek Free Labor Supervisor for Adult Son: A Modern Love Story From Hell

 Ever notice how some parents treat their adult son's girlfriend like an unpaid project manager for their failed parenting? There she stands, this 23-year-old woman, making more money than her boyfriend, yet somehow expected to wipe his metaphorical ass because mommy and daddy can't cut the fucking umbilical cord. What we're witnessing isn't a relationship—it's an elaborate transfer of ownership disguised as love, a cosmic joke playing out on the stage of suburban mediocrity where nobody gets the punchline except the universe itself, which is laughing so hard it's pissing dark matter. I (23F) have been dating my boyfriend Josh (29M) for 2 years. We live together as well. Recently, his parents have started asking me to get him to do things. "Make sure Josh goes to the dentist for his cracked tooth," or "Make sure Josh updates his passport," or "Make sure Josh changes his pet food for his cat. We don't like the brand," or ...